LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS
Authors: Jorgelina Coppa, Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Authors: Jorgelina Coppa, Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are relatively rare, but their incidence has increased over the past few decades. Their behavior can range from indolent to highly aggressive. The liver is the most common site of metastasis from GEP-NENs, with about 36% of patients with pNETs having synchronous neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), and 86% of these patients having liver only metastases. The predominance of liver metastasis is due to anatomical factors, such as the drainage of primary sites by portal systems, and possible biological factors, including the high affinity between NENs and the liver microenvironment. Numerous retrospective studies have shown a favorable prognosis for curative or even cytoreductive liver resection (LR), with a 5-year OS rate of 70–80%. Consequently, several guidelines have recommended LR for NELM. More than 90% of recurrences occur in the remnant liver, suggesting that micrometastases are already present in the remnant liver at the time of surgery, and that partial resection cannot provide a genuine cure for patients with NELM. (1-2-3)
Liver transplantation (LT) has been performed in patients with NELM with the theoretical aim of completely removing macro and micro NELMs. However, the prognosis in earlier eras was unsatisfactory, with 5-year OS and RFS rates of approximately 50% and 30%, respectively (4). Based on previous findings, our group, led by Prof. Mazzaferro, proposed the Milan criteria to define indications for LT in patients with NELM: 1) Confirmed histology of NET (G1-G2); 2) Primary tumor drained by the portal system and all extrahepatic disease removed with curative resection before LT; 3) Liver involvement ≤50%; 4) Good response or stable disease for at least 6 months before LT; and 5) Age ≤55 years
Table. Liver transplantation Milan criteria for patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) with liver metastases
| Absolute |
| Histological grade 1 or 2 |
| Portal drainage of the primary tumor |
| Hepatic involvement <50% |
| Pre-transplant curative resection of all extrahepatic lesions |
| Duration of stable disease > 6 months |
| Relative |
| Age < 60 years |
Figure. Transplant benefit for metastatic NET
Subsequent reports demonstrated outstanding outcomes following LT for NELM within the Milan criteria, with 10-year OS and RFS of 88.8% and 13.1%, respectively. The associated ‘transplant benefit’ was clinically and statistically significant at 10 years, equating to an additional 38.43 months of survival. Under such strict selection criteria, LT with perioperative multimodal medical management could enhance the chances of cure for patients with NELM (5). These criteria have been endorsed in the USA by OPTN to approve an LT candidate for NELM as a MELD exception (6). According to ENETS guidelines, LT may be considered in highly selected patients with carcinoid syndrome or other functional NETs and extensive liver disease, refractory to multiple systemic treatments as a salvage procedure (7).
No randomized controlled trials have compared the long-term outcomes between LT and LR or medical treatments. A recent international multi-institutional retrospective study compared long-term outcomes using propensity score matching. Both PFS and OS were significantly better in the LT group than in the LR group, with 5-year PFS rates of 64% and 14%, and 5-year OS rates of 75% and 68%, respectively. This study demonstrates a survival benefit of LT over LR, depending on adherence to the Milan selection criteria (8). Recurrence after LT for NELM requires appropriate management. A study from our group reported on 32 patients who experienced recurrence, including 25 patients who met the Milan criteria. The median time to recurrence was 82.9 months, with the most common site being the abdominal lymph nodes (59%), followed by the peritoneum and lungs (6% each). Surgery was used to manage recurrence in 44% of patients, resulting in a favorable 5-year survival rate of 76% after recurrence. These findings suggest that proper patient selection for LT can lead to good disease control and long-term survival through multimodal treatment, even after recurrence (9).